ArticleJournal of veterinary research2025
Molecular response in the pectoral muscles and livers of broiler chickens to mitochondrial stimulation by
Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mitochondria are the primary sites for adenosine triphosphate production through oxidative phosphorylation, thus supporting the high metabolic demands of avian physiology. By administering prebiotics Material and Methods: Three hundred incubated Ross 308 broiler eggs were injected: 60 with 0.2 mL of 0.2 mmol/L physiological saline (control group), and 60 each with 0.5 mg of xylotriose (XOS3 group), xylotetraose (XOS4 group), mannotriose (MOS3 group) or mannotetraose (MOS4 group) carried in 0.2 mL of physiological saline. On day 42 after hatching, the liver and pectoral muscle were collected from eight individuals from each group after sacrifice, and the muscle was evaluated physicochemically. Relative mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy numbers were analysed in a real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). Gene expression was determined by a reverse-transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR) for a mitochondrial gene panel. Results: The experimental factor was not shown to affect pectoral muscle weight. Water loss was significantly greater in the XOS4 group's muscles. The overall mtDNA copy number was stable in both tissues. The XOS3 and MOS4 groups' gene expression was significantly changed in pectoral muscle. Contrastingly, the XOS4 and MOS3 groups' gene expression was more altered in the liver. Statistically significantly different expression was detected of the Conclusion: The potential of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.