ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Dupilumab-Induced Systemic Hypoperfusion in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dupilumab is generally considered safe and effective for treating bullous pemphigoid (BP). We report the first case of recurrent hypoperfusion-induced cerebral infarction temporally associated with dupilumab administration in an elderly patient. Case Presentation: A 96-year-old male with BP, type 2 diabetes, and a history of stroke developed acute hypotension, depressed consciousness, and reduced oral intake within 24-72 hours after three separate dupilumab injections. Initial neuroimaging revealed watershed infarcts. Proactive volume expansion during one administration successfully averted new infarction, whereas lack of prophylactic hydration on another occasion precipitated a transient ischemic attack (TIA). Observations & Analysis: A significant temporal association was documented. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale score was 8, indicating a probable association. The patient's advanced age, compromised cerebrovascular reserve, and mandatory discontinuation of antithrombotics created a hypervulnerable substrate. The hypotensive mechanism is hypothesized to involve IL-4/IL-13 pathway blockade, potentially disrupting endothelial function and vascular tone regulation. Conclusion & Clinical Implications: This case report describes a potential, albeit rare, serious adverse effect associated with dupilumab in an elderly individual at high risk. Based on this single experience, we suggest at least 72 hours of post-injection blood pressure monitoring for high-risk patients. Management could include administering prophylactic fluid replacement based on the patient's actual condition and critically reassessing concomitant antihypertensive regimens. This finding highlights the need for heightened clinical vigilance and suggests that the drug's safety profile in advanced-age patients may warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.