ArticleNursing research and practice2025
Digitising Medical Nutrition Therapy in Gestational Diabetes: A Multisite Pilot Study.
Article in Nursing research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Medical nutrition therapy, which incorporates dietary tracking, is routinely used in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, paper-based tracking approaches are associated with several challenges. Based on user feedback, the M♡THer app, an existing digital platform for GDM management, was enhanced with a digital diet diary feature. This study aimed to evaluate the uptake, usage, usability and acceptability of the diet diary feature. Methods: The diary was codesigned and trialled in three hospital services. Data collection occurred over 6 months. User engagement metrics, surveys and interviews with healthcare providers (HCPs) and app users were analysed using thematic analysis and triangulation. Results: Of the 305 M♡THer app users, 95 used the diet diary with uptake varying from 13% to 53%. Users logged their diet for an average of 33.5 days. The diary improved patient-provider communication, reducing consultation time and supporting dietary literacy. Barriers to uptake and optimal engagement included the timing of the diary introduction and usability issues. Conclusion: This study contributes to the growing evidence on digitally supported GDM care, highlighting the feasibility of applying a digital diet diary for individuals with GDM and their HCPs. The approach positively enhanced diet tracking and consultation efficiency. Future iterations should prioritise early introduction, a condensed user interface and comprehensive food library. Trial Registration: Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA): CT-2020-CTN-01167-1-v8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.