ArticleCureus2025
Regional Variation in Skull Thickness Along a Horizontal Plane: Implications for Neuroanatomy Teaching, Neurosurgery, Radiology and Forensic Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To quantify skull thickness variation at a horizontal plane passing 2 cm above the highest points of the left and right supraorbital margins anteriorly and the external occipital protuberance posteriorly and to propose a standardized six-region classification for cranial margins. Methods Fifteen adult dry basilar skulls from four publicly funded medical institutions in Eastern India were studied. The skull margin at the defined plane was marked at 1-cm intervals between the anterior and posterior midlines on both sides. Thickness was measured using a digital micrometer by three independent observers, with mean values used for analysis. The margin was divided into six regions per side: anteromedial (AM), anterolateral (AL), lateral anterior (LA), lateral posterior (LP), posterolateral (PL), and posteromedial (PM). Inter-observer reliability was assessed using a two-way random-effects intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). All statistical analyses were performed using Stata v18. Results A total of 2,235 measurements were analyzed. Thickness decreased from AM to LA regions and then increased toward the PM region. The LA region was thinnest (left=3.144±0.286 mm; right=3.234±0.809 mm), while the PM region was thickest (left=10.638±1.661 mm; right=11.266±1.659 mm). ICC exceeded 0.9 for over 80% of measurements, confirming high measurement consistency. Conclusions This study establishes a reproducible six-region classification and provides precise morphometric data along a clinically important horizontal plane. Apart from its use in cranium sectioning in cadavers, the findings can guide safe neurosurgical entry points, improve radiological lesion localization, and support forensic cranial analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.