ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025
Outcomes After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Valve in Valve, Valve in Ring, and Mitral Annular Calcification.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are few reports about midterm to long-term outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) in valve in valve (ViV), valve in ring (ViR), and valve in mitral annular calcification (ViM). The aim of this study was to assess postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent TMVR for calcification or failing valves. Methods: Between March 2016 and July 2024, 82 patients underwent TMVR with SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifescience) balloon-expandable valve, with 72 transseptal and 10 transapical access. Of 82 patients, 47 had TMVR with ViV/ViR and 35 with ViM. Postprocedural outcomes and midterm survivals were evaluated comparing ViV/ViR group with ViM group. Results: The ViM required more ventricular septal ablation before TMVR for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (31.4% [11/35] vs 4.3% [2/47]; Conclusions: Short-term and midterm outcomes of TMVR in ViV and ViR were better than those of ViM in this patient cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.