ReviewReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2025
Clinical governance in radiation oncology.
Review in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smells like beam spirit - a radiotherapy multiverse of (super) humans in white coats: seven radiotherapy phenotypes that suggest we may be closer to superheroes than we think.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical governance (CG) is an emerging framework that ensures accountability for delivering safe, effective, and continuously improving healthcare services. Originally introduced in the United Kingdom in the late 1990s as part of reforms in the National Health Service, CG draws upon principles of corporate governance to establish system-wide oversight of clinical quality, safety, and accountability. CG provides an overarching organisational framework encompassing leadership structures, clinical effectiveness, risk management, audits, professional development, and patient engagement. In radiation oncology, CG plays a critical role in enhancing treatment safety and quality by standardising protocols, conducting regular audits and peer reviews, implementing risk management strategies, and supporting continuous education for multidisciplinary teams. It also ensures accountability through transparent reporting to regulators, collaboration with patient groups, and commitment to evidence-based practice. Ethical principles - beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice - are central to CG and provide the foundation for maintaining professional standards of care. Despite the increasing use of the term clinical governance, it is often only poorly understood. In the present review, we define the concept of clinical governance and discuss its role in healthcare, with a particular focus on the field of radiation oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.