ArticleOsteoporosis and sarcopenia2025
Feasibility and tolerability of electrical muscle stimulation during rehabilitation in older adults with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
Article in Osteoporosis and sarcopenia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute-phase rehabilitation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: current evidence from scoping review.Asian spine journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In the context of Japan's rapidly aging population, osteoporotic vertebral fractures are becoming increasingly prevalent, creating greater demands for rehabilitation amid healthcare labor shortages. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and potential efficacy of abdominal electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) as an adjunct to rehabilitation in older adults with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, focusing on muscle thickness and bowel function. Methods: Thirty-four elderly patients (mean age: 85 years) hospitalized for osteoporotic vertebral fractures underwent conventional physical and occupational therapy combined with abdominal EMS four times per week. Rectus abdominis muscle thickness was assessed by ultrasound, and bowel function was evaluated using bowel movement frequency and laxative usage. Interrater reliability for ultrasound measurement was high (ICC = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.90-0.99). Results: Rectus abdominis muscle thickness increased significantly by 0.5 mm (P = 0.001). A non-significant trend toward increased spontaneous bowel movements was observed (5-6 times/week; P = 0.058), and laxative use decreased significantly (P = 0.0172). No EMS-related adverse events were reported, and all participants completed the intervention as scheduled. Conclusions: Abdominal EMS is a feasible, safe, and potentially effective adjunct to conventional rehabilitation for older adults with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, even during periods of bed rest. It may contribute to muscle maintenance and support bowel function. These findings support further investigation in larger prospective studies to confirm efficacy and explore long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.