ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
Epigenetic Clocks in Skin Aging: From Exposome Drivers to Biomarkers and Therapeutic Interventions.
Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skin as a sentinel and modulator of systemic aging: a translational framework for evidence-based gerotherapeutics.GeroScience · 2026Review
- A review of the circadian regulation of stem cells: harnessing the internal body clock for enhanced regenerative therapies.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Dual modes of action: direct regulation and ceRNA-mediated mechanisms of ncRNAs in dermal fibroblast senescence.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin aging is a multifactorial process driven by a combination of intrinsic genetic programming and extrinsic environmental exposures. Recent advances in epigenetics have illuminated how changes in DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs regulate skin aging, with the epigenetic clock emerging as a powerful tool to quantify biological age. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on how environmental and lifestyle factors - particularly ultraviolet radiation, pollution, smoking, diet, and stress - accelerate skin aging through epigenetic mechanisms, while also evaluating the potential of skin-specific epigenetic clocks as biomarkers for early detection of premature aging and for guiding therapeutic interventions. We further discuss the expanding field of epigenetic-targeted therapies in dermatology, encompassing topical agents, energy-based devices, and systemic approaches that may reverse or delay visible signs of cutaneous aging. By integrating insights from molecular biology, environmental science, and clinical dermatology, this review positions skin aging not as an irreversible outcome but as a modifiable, biologically regulated process with promising avenues for personalized prevention and rejuvenation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.