SynthesisActa diabetologica2026
Efficacy and safety of orforglipron in type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity: a GRADE-assessed meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis with subgroup evaluations by diabetic status, obesity status, and dose regimens.
Synthesis in Acta diabetologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Orforglipron: A Comprehensive Review of an Oral Small-Molecule GLP-1 Receptor Agonist for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrforglipron, an oral non-peptide GLP-1 receptor agonist, is being evaluated for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. A quantitative synthesis of efficacy and safety across doses and phenotypes is needed.
objectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of orforglipron versus placebo in adults with T2DM and/or obesity, including prespecified subgroup analyses by dose and metabolic phenotype, along with certainty evaluation using GRADE and trial sequential analysis (TSA).
methodsFollowing PRISMA 2020, randomized controlled trials comparing orforglipron with placebo were combined using random-effects meta-analysis to determine mean differences (MD) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity (I²), influence (leave-one-out analysis), dose groups (3, 6, 24, 36 mg), and phenotype subgroups (obese/non-diabetic vs. non-obese/diabetic) were analyzed; TSA evaluated the required information size and monitoring boundaries.
resultsFive trials (n = 2,672; orforglipron 1,413; placebo 1,259) were included. Orforglipron reduced HbA1c (primary MD − 1.07%, 95% CI − 2.00 to − 0.13; I²=100%; sensitivity MD − 1.45%, 95% CI − 1.49 to − 1.41; I²=0%), body weight (primary MD − 5.25 kg, 95% CI − 6.72 to − 3.77; I²=96%; sensitivity MD − 4.21 kg, 95% CI − 4.40 to − 4.02; I²=0%), BMI (MD − 1.99 kg/m², 95% CI − 2.97 to − 1.01; I²=97%), and systolic blood pressure (primary MD − 3.90 mmHg, 95% CI − 6.44 to − 1.35; I²=91%; sensitivity MD − 2.56 mmHg, 95% CI − 4.64 to − 0.48; I²=22%). Fasting plasma glucose decreased significantly overall (MD − 25.77 mg/dL, 95% CI − 58.70 to − 7.18; very high heterogeneity; dose-response evident). Diastolic blood pressure was neutral (primary MD − 0.32 mmHg, 95% CI − 2.36 to 1.71; sensitivity MD + 0.68 mmHg, 95% CI − 0.02 to 1.39). Heart rate increased (primary MD + 6.38 bpm, 95% CI + 2.99 to + 9.77; high heterogeneity). Hypoglycemia (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.23 to 4.86) and serious adverse events (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.62) did not differ from placebo. TSA supported strong evidence for weight, BMI, and SBP; additional data is needed for DBP, heart rate, hypoglycemia, and SAEs.
conclusionsReported as primary pooled effects, orforglipron improves HbA1c, weight, BMI, SBP, and fasting plasma glucose, with a class-consistent increase in heart rate and no excess in hypoglycaemia or serious adverse events versus placebo. Sensitivity analyses generally reduced heterogeneity without reversing conclusions. TSA indicates conclusions for weight, BMI, and SBP are robust; longer-term comparative trials should refine DBP and safety signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41498807What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.