ArticleAnimal cognition2026
Unpacking response inhibition in animals - part 1: a conceptual framework.
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unpacking response Inhibition in animals - part 2: an empirical test.Animal cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Response inhibition - the ability to suppress or stop actions - is crucial for adaptive behaviour across species. The concept of response inhibition has traditionally been regarded as a unidimensional psychological ability. However, there is an increasing recognition of its multifaceted nature. In Part 1 of this study, we present a conceptual framework to explain variability across tasks and contexts. We conceptualise response inhibition as a race between a ‘go’ runner and a ‘stop’ runner, with both runners influenced by stimulus type, stimulus timing, and action type. To illustrate how task-specific factors shape response inhibition, we apply this framework to five response inhibition tasks: the stop-signal, stop-change, detour barrier, A-not-B, and thwarting tasks. Our framework highlights the need for precise methods and careful interpretation of response inhibition measures and provides a basis for nuanced investigations of response inhibition control and its ecological and evolutionary significance. In the accompanying Part 2, we use this framework to test predictions about correlations between different measures of response inhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.