Evidence mapPaperPMID 41498972Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2026

Unpacking response inhibition in animals - part 1: a conceptual framework.

Camille A Troisi, Alizée Vernouillet, Reinoud Allaert, Sophia Knoch, An Martel, Luc Lens, Frederick Verbruggen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Camille A TroisiCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. camille.troisi@univ-rennes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4036-3848
Alizée VernouilletCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2525-2936
Reinoud AllaertCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6122-496X
Sophia KnochCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9156-5725
An MartelCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7609-5649
Luc LensCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0241-2215
Frederick VerbruggenCentre for Research on Ecology, Cognition and Behaviour of Birds, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7958-0719

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11P3G24NHorizon 2020 Framework Programme 769595HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme 101062662Universiteit Gent 01M00221Universiteit Gent BOF21/PDO/084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response inhibition - the ability to suppress or stop actions - is crucial for adaptive behaviour across species. The concept of response inhibition has traditionally been regarded as a unidimensional psychological ability. However, there is an increasing recognition of its multifaceted nature. In Part 1 of this study, we present a conceptual framework to explain variability across tasks and contexts. We conceptualise response inhibition as a race between a ‘go’ runner and a ‘stop’ runner, with both runners influenced by stimulus type, stimulus timing, and action type. To illustrate how task-specific factors shape response inhibition, we apply this framework to five response inhibition tasks: the stop-signal, stop-change, detour barrier, A-not-B, and thwarting tasks. Our framework highlights the need for precise methods and careful interpretation of response inhibition measures and provides a basis for nuanced investigations of response inhibition control and its ecological and evolutionary significance. In the accompanying Part 2, we use this framework to test predictions about correlations between different measures of response inhibition.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalInhibition, PsychologicalAnimalsA-no-B taskDetour taskExecutive functionsInhibitory controlRace modelResponse inhibitionStop-signal task

Identifiers

PMID41498972
PMCPMC12872649

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.