ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2026
Managing Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in 2025 and Beyond.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating Treatment Selection in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Mixed Method Analysis of Factors Influencing Patient Decision-Making.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- [Advances in the clinical management of acute severe ulcerative colitis].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026Review
- Navigating Treatment Selection in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Mixed Method Analysis of Factors Influencing Patient Decision Making.Research square · 2026Article
- Editorial: Advances in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAcute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) remains a high-risk condition with suboptimal clinical outcomes despite advancements in diagnostics, prognostication, and therapies. This review synthesizes recent evidence to address critical gaps in care, focusing on optimizing medical strategies to reduce colectomy rates and improve patient outcomes. RECENT
findingsRecent studies have identified novel biomarkers and predictive models for stratifying patients as high-risk for colectomy. Several emerging therapeutic strategies to optimize care have also been explored. Intensified infliximab dosing has not consistently shown improved clinical outcomes across all patients with ASUC, though it may benefit a subset of patients with unfavorable pharmacokinetics. Furthermore, Janus kinase inhibitors have shown promise in reducing colectomy rates, offering a potential alternative for select patients; however, supporting evidence remains preliminary. Despite these advancements, colectomy remains exceedingly common but continues to serve as a critical intervention to reduce complications and mortality. This underscores the therapeutic efficacy ceiling that still exists in our current approach to ASUC in 2025. Modern ASUC management prioritizes rapid risk stratification (using clinical, endoscopic, and biomarker data) and patient-tailored advanced therapy selection. Future strategies should focus on conducting rigorous trials of emerging agents in comparison to our current protocols, while integrating real-time, personalized, and dynamic prognostic tools to reduce heterogeneity in treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.