ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
A novel two-sample Mendelian randomization framework integrating common and rare variants: application to assess the effect of HDL-C on preeclampsia risk.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mendelian randomization (MR) has become an important technique for establishing causal relationships between risk factors and health outcomes. By using genetic variants as instrumental variables, it can mitigate bias due to confounding and reverse causation in observational studies. Current MR analyses have predominantly used common genetic variants as instruments, which represent only part of the genetic architecture of complex traits. Rare variants, which can have larger effect sizes and provide unique biological insights, have been understudied due to statistical and methodological challenges. We introduce MR-common and annotation-informed rare variants (MR-CARV), a novel framework integrating common and rare genetic variants in two-sample MR. This method leverages comprehensive genetic data made available by high-throughput sequencing technologies and large-scale consortia. Rare variants are aggregated into functional categories, such as gene-coding, gene-noncoding, and nongene regions, by leveraging variant annotations and biological impact as weights. The effects of rare variant sets are then estimated with STAARpipeline and combined with the estimated effects of common variants by the existing MR methods. Simulation studies demonstrate that MR-CARV maintains robust type I error and achieves higher statistical power, with up to a 66.3% relative increase compared with existing methods only based on common variants. Consistent with these findings, application to real data on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and preeclampsia showed that MR-CARV [inverse variance weighted (IVW)] yielded a more precise and statistically significant effect estimate (-0.020, SE = 0.0102, $P$ =.0470) than IVW using only common variants (-0.023, SE = 0.0123, $P$ =.0659).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.