Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41499372›Full record

ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2026

Auricular Acupuncture for Facial Aesthetics: A Preliminary Retrospective Clinical Study of 217 Cases.

Wangpiaoyun Zhu, Panita Prateepjumraskul, Yike Han, Hantong Hu, Lifang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wangpiaoyun ZhuThe Third Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2254-2566
Panita PrateepjumraskulInternational Education College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yike HanThe Third Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Hantong HuDepartment of Acupuncture, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8759-5083
Lifang ChenDepartment of Acupuncture, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9529-7876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn recent years, acupuncture has gained attention as a safe and natural method in cosmetic medicine. Auricular acupuncture has been insufficiently studied in the field of facial aesthetics. Our previous clinical observations were associated with rapid facial tightening, lifting, and slimming following auricular acupuncture, which is characterized by its simplicity, safety, and convenience.

methodsIn this retrospective study, we collected data from 242 participants who received auricular acupuncture for facial cosmetic treatment. Participants received weekly treatments, with facial photographs taken before and after each session. Outcome measures included the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and FACE-Q score. Evaluations were performed at three time points: before the first treatment, immediately after the first treatment, and following 3 months of continuous treatment. The safety assessment monitored adverse reactions during the trial period.

resultsA total of 217 participants were included in the statistical analysis as valid cases, of which 131 were assessed for immediate response and 86 for intermediate-term response. Immediate results showed a statistically significant decrease in WSRS scores (from 2.49 ± 0.69 to 1.86 ± 0.87, p < 0.05) and a 77.10% improvement in GAIS. Efficacy observation at 3 months showed WSRS score decreased from 2.53 ± 0.66 to 1.67 ± 0.73 (p < 0.05) and GAIS improvement of 95.35%. Participants reported high overall satisfaction with their facial appearance. After immediate treatment, the improvement in nasolabial folds was the most effective, with a score of 3.59 ± 0.62 (out of 5.00); after intermediate-term treatment, the improvement of the cheeks was the most effective, with a score of 3.78 ± 0.64 (out of 5.00). In both immediate and intermediate-term treatments, improvements were observed in the lower face and jawline, with relatively high satisfaction. Minimal pain was noted, with 64.98% reporting slight discomfort and 35.02% reporting no pain. No severe events were observed, affirming the treatment's safety and comfort.

conclusionsAuricular acupuncture was associated with improvements in both immediate and intermediate-term evaluations. The immediate effects include facial slimming, lifting, reduction of nasolabial folds, and improvement of nasolabial lines. Intermediate-term effects include tightening of the face, promotion of facial rejuvenation, overall facial enhancement, and an increase in participant satisfaction. Nonetheless, in view of multiple inherent limitations as a retrospective study, the findings should be regarded as preliminary and interpreted with caution, and future studies should employ prospective, adequately powered multicenter designs with longer follow-up, validated patient-reported outcomes, standardized image acquisition, and integration of objective imaging and biomechanical metrics.

Indexed as

Acupuncture, EarCosmetic TechniquesSkin AgingAdultEstheticsFaceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPreliminary DataRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeacupuncture cosmetologyauricular acupuncturemedical cosmetologyretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID41499372
PMCPMC12779092

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.