ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2026
Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulations to Predict Antihypertensive Drug Doses in Cirrhotic Patients.
Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Model-informed dose optimization of carvedilol and nebivolol in cirrhotic patients: a pilot randomized clinical study.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver cirrhosis can alter drug pharmacokinetics, often requiring dose adjustments. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling aids in predicting these pharmacokinetic changes in cirrhosis patients. This study developed and validated PBPK models for multiple antihypertensive drugs to predict dosing across varying severities of cirrhosis. Models were initially validated in healthy volunteers, then adjusted to incorporate cirrhosis-specific pathophysiological changes. Predicted results (area under the curve [AUC] and plasma maximum concentration [Cmax]) showed good agreement with clinical data (within 2-fold). The models were further used to simulate untested cirrhotic populations and to estimate unbound plasma AUC across different disease stages, and the results were compared with the healthy population. The model predicted that the healthy doses of nifedipine 20 mg three times daily (TID), verapamil 80 mg TID, nebivolol 10 mg once daily, and diltiazem 60 mg TID should be adjusted to 44%, 41%, 49.8%, and 51% of these doses, respectively, in the mild cirrhosis population. For moderate cirrhosis, the predicted reductions were to 21%, 25%, 29.8%, and 39%, respectively. In severe cirrhosis, greater reductions to 9.9%, 19%, 12.3%, and 26%, respectively, were necessary to achieve the same unbound drug exposures as in healthy subjects. Among the studied drugs, nifedipine was the most affected and diltiazem was the least affected by cirrhosis, highlighting variability in hepatic impact across antihypertensive drugs. In the absence of dedicated clinical trials in cirrhosis for these drugs, validated PBPK models offer evidence-based insights to support clinicians in evaluating antihypertensive dosing options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.