Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41499422›Full record

ReviewPLOS global public health2025

A decolonial feminist perspective on gender equality programming in the Global South.

Ogochukwu Udenigwe, Judi Aubel, Seye Abimbola

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ogochukwu UdenigweFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6844-8854
Judi AubelGrandmother Project-Change through Culture, Rome, Italy.
Seye AbimbolaFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The feminisms emerging from postcolonial regions of the Global South have critiqued gender equality initiatives that adapt to, rather than dismantle, racist, capitalist, and patriarchal systems. They call for an exploration of how these initiatives become hosts to oppressive forces that derail gender equality efforts and worsen the health and well-being of women and girls in the Global South. Drawing on decolonial feminist perspectives, this paper addresses two broad questions: How does a gender equality agenda rooted in capitalist structures impact the health and well-being of women and girls in the Global South? Have attempts at transforming gender equality in the Global South been solely liberatory? The authors examined constructions of gender equality in 17 program documents from contemporary women and girl-centred international NGO programs in the Global South. The findings revealed four key themes related to shaping gender equality in programs and their implications for the health and well-being of women and girls. These themes include: 1) Reinforcing hierarchical knowledge praxis (excluding or silencing knowledge originating from the Global South, 2) Culturalizing violence (violence as an intrinsic characteristic of culture in the Global South), 3) Labelling work as inherently liberating (depoliticizing poverty, glossing over exploitative economic practices), 4) Universalizing human rights discourses (emphasizing neoliberal assumptions of personhood). We conclude by recommending a delinking from Western narratives and instead integrating a decolonial feminist perspective into gender equality programs to uncover and dislodge the myriad manifestations of colonial influences. Failing to do so, international NGO programs and policies will either be counterproductive or limited to partial and temporary success.

Identifiers

PMID41499422
PMCPMC12788186

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.