SynthesisThe Journal of infectious diseases2026
Whole-Exome Sequencing for the Identification of Genetic Factors Implicated in Severe Bacterial Infections: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mortality rate and predictors of mortality of pediatric sepsis and septic shock in a Moroccan tertiary care center.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSevere bacterial infections (SBIs) represent a major health issue worldwide. Many studies have explored patients' genetic predispositions to SBI, but most of them chose a candidate-gene design. Only few adopted a whole-exome sequencing (WES) approach. We aimed at reporting nontargeted WES studies describing genetic variants associated with SBI susceptibility in previously healthy patients without a known predisposition for infections.
methodsWe included studies using WES in previously healthy patients who had SBI. We excluded studies that included nonbacterial infections or patients with a known genetic or dysimmune disorders. We assessed certainty in the body of evidence and detected risk of bias. Studies were grouped according to the patients' infectious phenotype to present main common characteristics and compare results.
resultsTwelve studies were included, gathering 694 patients with WES data. They described genetic associations with various infectious phenotypes, using heterogenous methods to prioritize genetic variants. This diversity led to the identification of different genes or pathways associated with infection susceptibility or severity, supporting WES use in patients with SBI. WES was also a performant diagnostic tool. In this review, 42% of previously healthy patients with SBI had putatively disease-causing variants in genes with inborn errors of immunity.
conclusionsOverall, included studies supported the use of WES as they successfully diagnosed inborn errors of immunity in patients with SBI. Future studies should follow strict guidelines to correctly prioritize disease-causing variants. Because of the rarity of this disease, sample sizes are often limited. Collaboration between research teams should allow for large-scale studies with robust statistical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.