ReviewJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2026
Social Housing of Postoperative Animals to Support Animal Welfare.
Review in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single housing of animals, or social isolation, is a known stressor for many species. Generally, laboratory animals are housed in social groups as a default to support their behavioral welfare. In some research protocols, investigators may request exemptions from social housing policies after surgical procedures due to concerns that cohoused animals may damage implanted devices, remove each other's wound closures, or cause other stress or injury that may interfere with the study. However, the practice of singly housing postoperative animals may result in greater stress for animals and unintended consequences for research being conducted. Therefore, the IACUC or relevant ethical body should judiciously consider any request for single housing and require adequate justification for making this exception. This review discusses the social nature of some common research animals, the research effects of single housing, the regulatory requirements for social housing, and successful cases of socially housing postoperative and/or instrumented animals in the research setting with the goal of promoting social housing of postoperative animals.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.