ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2026
Associations between MR Imaging-derived Metrics under Exercise Load, Wingate Test Results, and Sprint Performance.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe primary objective of this study was to determine the relationship between Wingate test, athletic performance, and MRI parameters in athletes. Additionally, we examined whether there were significant differences in these parameters between athletes and non-athletes during dorsiflexion exercises.
methodsTwenty-two male athletes and 9 non-athletes performed dorsiflexion exercises with a 4-kg load. MRI scans, including T2* mapping and diffusion tensor imaging, were conducted pre-exercise, immediately after exercise, and 30 minutes post-exercise. Quantitative parameters, including T2* values, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and eigenvalues (λ2, λ3), were analyzed. Wingate test results and athletics scoring based on the 2022 World Athletics Scoring Tables were used to evaluate anaerobic power and sprint performance.
resultsMRI parameters, particularly T2* changes and λ3, showed significant correlations with Wingate test results and athletic performance. Pre-exercise λ3, reflecting muscle fiber orientation and thickness, emerged as a key predictor of athletic performance alongside T2* changes and Wingate power. The integration of MRI-derived metrics with Wingate test results improved the prediction of athletic scores compared to Wingate power alone. Although differences between athletes and non-athletes in T2* and λ2 were observed, these findings serve as supplementary evidence supporting the role of MRI in identifying muscle characteristics critical for athletic performance.
conclusionMRI-derived parameters combined with performance tests can provide valuable insights into muscle recovery, structure, and athletic performance, with potential for predicting athlete scores and optimizing training strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.