Evidence mapPaperPMID 41501059Full record

SynthesisNature communications2026

Comprehensive evaluation of GLP-1 receptor agonists: an umbrella review of clinical outcomes across multiple diseases.

Fanjing Kong, Yanru Zhao, Weiming Zhang, Xinyi Wang, Tianyu Wu, Ziyi Zhou, Ying Xu, Lina Xia, Tao Sun

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fanjing Kong *School of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1453-8562
Yanru Zhao *School of Intelligent Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Weiming Zhang *School of Intelligent Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Xinyi Wang *School of Intelligent Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Tianyu Wu *School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0206-3101
Ziyi ZhouSchool of Intelligent Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Ying XuHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China. xuying.doctor@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1445-4997
Lina XiaSchool of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China. xialina@cdutcm.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5338-9126
Tao SunSchool of Intelligent Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China. suntao513@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2773-9174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) were initially approved for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent evidence suggests their therapeutic potential in various diseases, though their efficacy and safety remain incompletely understood. Here, we conduct an umbrella review including 123 meta-analyses covering 464 outcomes from 5617 articles to comprehensively assess the effectiveness and adverse events (AEs) of GLP-1 RAs across diverse outcomes. GLP-1 RAs showed trends toward improvements in endocrine and metabolic, cardiovascular, renal, and respiratory outcomes, cognitive function, with a potential reduction in fracture risk and all-cause mortality in certain populations. However, increased risks of certain AEs, including diabetic retinopathy, ketoacidosis, gastrointestinal events, and treatment discontinuation, were also observed. AMSTAR 2 assessments indicate that the existing evidence is limited by methodological shortcomings, including incomplete reporting of excluded studies, suboptimal literature search strategies, and insufficient evaluation of how bias in primary studies may influence meta-analytic estimates. Some outcomes did not reach statistical significance in all populations, highlighting the need for further high-quality clinical research. Careful consideration of potential benefits and risks is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes and ensuring patient safety when using GLP-1 RAs in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 ReceptorHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicTreatment OutcomeGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 ReceptorGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID41501059
PMCPMC12847739

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.