Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501135›Full record

ReviewCommunications chemistry2026

Learning physical interactions to compose biological large language models.

Joseph D Clark, Tanner J Dean, Diwakar Shukla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph D Clark *School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1442-2630
Tanner J Dean *Center for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Diwakar ShuklaCenter for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. diwakar@illinois.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4079-5381

Funding

Elucidating sequence, structural and dynamic basis of the functional regulation of membrane proteinsR35GM142745 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SHUKLA, DIWAKAR · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
National Science Foundation (NSF) CHE-2019897NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning models have become fundamental tools in drug design. In particular, large language models trained on biochemical sequences learn feature vectors that guide drug discovery through virtual screening. However, such models do not capture the molecular interactions important for binding affinity and specificity. Therefore, there is a need to merge representations from distinct biological modalities to effectively represent molecular complexes. We present an overview of the methods to combine molecular representations and propose that future work should develop biochemical foundation models that jointly encode diverse molecular modalities. Specifically, learning to merge the representations from internal layers of domain specific biological language models could improve generalizability in the context of interaction prediction. We demonstrate that 'composing' biochemical language models performs similar or better than standard methods representing molecular interactions despite having significantly fewer features. We also discuss recent methods for interpreting and democratizing large language models that could aid the development of interaction aware foundation models for biology. Finally, we present a vision for future research that allows for predicting the evolution of molecular interactions across biophysical contexts.

Identifiers

PMID41501135
PMCPMC12894927

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.