ArticleScientific reports2026
Increased axial resolution OCT improves structure-function correlation of the disorganization of the retinal inner layers in diabetic retinal disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether optical coherence tomography (OCT) with enhanced axial resolution improves structural characterization of the disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) in diabetic retinal disease (DRD) and its association with functional and vascular alterations. In this prospective cross-sectional study, 55 diabetic patients, 27 with DRIL (age: 57.1 ± 14.6 years) and 28 eyes without DRIL with diabetes mellitus (DM) type I/II (age: 58.2 ± 13.0 years), were examined with conventional spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT), High-Resolution (High-Res) OCT, OCT angiography (OCTA), and microperimetry. DRIL areas were significantly smaller on High-Res OCT compared to SD-OCT (mean ± standard deviation, 0.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.3 ± 1.2 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.