Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501362›Full record

ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026

A multi-layer retrieval-augmented large language model framework for enhancing hypertension education.

Yijun Wang, Yujie Luan, Siyi Cheng, Menglei Hao, Wuping Tan, Ruijie Hu, Zhuoya Yao, Jun Wang, Jinhui Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Advancing retrieval-augmented medical AI: methodological considerations for the HEART framework in hypertension education.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yijun Wang *Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yujie Luan *Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Siyi Cheng *Department of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Menglei HaoCenter of Gerontology and Geriatrics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wuping TanDepartment of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Ruijie HuDepartment of Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhuoya YaoDepartment of Cardiology; The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Jun WangDepartment of Cardiology; The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China. junwang0607@163.com.
Jinhui WuCenter of Gerontology and Geriatrics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. wujinhui@scu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate considerable potential in enhancing the retrieval of health information. However, the hallucinatory they produce poses a security challenge. This study aimed to improve the accuracy and reliability of LLMs in hypertension education through the integration of integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology. We constructed a hypertension supplement knowledge base, and subsequently integrated it into a RAG technology, resulting in the development of the HEART (Hypertension Enhancing Answer Retrieval Tool) framework. A set of 50 commonly asked questions related to hypertension was used to evaluate the performance of four base LLMs-ChatGPT-4o, Claude-3.5, Gemini-2.5, and Llama-3.3-as well as their corresponding HEART-enhanced versions. Clinical experts assessed each response in terms of accuracy, completeness, consistency, robustness, security, and overall quality. The integration with the HEART framework led to a significant improvement in the performance of all four LLMs across five key evaluation dimensions: accuracy, completeness, consistency, security, and robustness (all P < 0.05). The average overall quality scores for all models increased significantly: from 3.57 (SD 0.72) to 4.20 (SD 0.41) for Llama-3.3, from 3.92 (SD 0.70) to 4.38 (SD 0.42) for Claude-3.5, from 3.91 (SD 0.73) to 4.32 (SD 0.39) for ChatGPT-4o, and from 4.03 (SD 0.69) to 4.38 (SD 0.41) for Gemini-2.5 (all P < 0.001). This study highlights the importance of combining high-quality, domain-specific medical data with advanced artificial intelligence techniques to enhance accuracy and reduce misinformation in healthcare applications.

Indexed as

HypertensionLarge Language ModelsPatient Education as TopicHumansDigital hypertensionHealth LiteracyImplemental hypertensionLarge Language ModelsPatient EducationRetrieval-Augmented Generation

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.