ReviewPediatric research2026
Neonatal neurocritical care considerations for prenatally identified neurological disorders.
Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnosis Through Whole Genome Sequencing and Care Utilization in Children With Severe Illness.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With increased access to advanced prenatal neuroimaging and genetic testing, neurological disorders such as brain malformations, brain injuries, and genetic disorders, are increasingly being diagnosed during pregnancy. In this review, we address neonatal neurocritical care considerations for the population with prenatally identified neurological disorders. We identify antenatal considerations, including planning location of delivery, as well as postnatal considerations, including clinical phenotyping, neuromonitoring, neuroimaging, and genetic testing. The importance of interdisciplinary collaboration between obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, neonatology, pediatric neurology, neuroradiology, genetics, palliative care, early intervention and habilitative services is emphasized. We outline high-priority research gaps, and highlight the need for large, multicenter studies that capture diverse geographies, populations, care practices and settings longitudinally. IMPACT: Fetal neurology is a rapidly evolving field owing to the increased prenatal diagnosis of neurological disorders; however, the natural history of many fetal neurological disorders is not well known. We identify interdisciplinary neonatal neurocritical care considerations for newborns with prenatally diagnosed neurological disorders, such as neuroimaging, neuromonitoring, and family support. We outline high-priority research gaps in fetal neurology relevant to neurocritical care, including the need to prioritize large-scale longitudinal studies on the etiologies, short- and long-term outcomes of fetal neurologic disorders across diverse geographies and populations to improve counseling and care.
Identifiers
41501412What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.