ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026
Differential neural responses to rhythmic and patterned TMS protocols: Insights from EEG spectral analysis.
Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) engages brain networks for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), using either rhythmic (e.g., 10 Hz) or patterned (e.g., intermittent Theta Burst, or iTBS) stimulation protocols. The distinct effects of these protocols on brain function are not well understood. Sixteen subjects with MDD underwent a TMS-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) "interrogation" paradigm, in which a broad range of rhythmic and patterned stimulation frequencies were administered in a randomized order to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC). rTMS-induced changes in oscillatory activity and effective connectivity to the DLPFC were examined at each frequency. Linear mixed-effects models revealed widespread changes in power and connectivity, with magnitude and regional distribution of change dependent upon both protocol and frequency of stimulation. Increases in beta band power were most prominent with patterned stimulation, while rhythmic stimulation increased both alpha and beta power at stimulation frequencies greater than 7 Hz (p < 0.05). Source localization showed that patterned and rhythmic stimulation elicited activation in distinct subregions of the cingulate. Rhythmic and patterned stimulation also had distinct effects on connectivity: notably, only rhythmic stimulation increased connectivity with regions near the stimulation site, while only patterned stimulation decreased connectivity to the left precuneus. Both protocols increased the effective connectivity to the orbitofrontal cortex in the theta and beta response bands (p < 0.05). These results indicate that rhythmic and patterned rTMS engage distinct brain regions in a protocol- and frequency-dependent manner. Future studies should examine how these mechanistic differences may relate to clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.