Evidence mapPaperPMID 41501546Full record

ReviewGeroScience2026

Review: Systemic inflammation after stroke. Therapy and perspective.

Abuzan Mihaela, Andreea Cercel, Thorsten R Doeppner, Dirk M Hermann, Roxana Surugiu, Denisa F V Pirscoveanu, Aurel Popa-Wagner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abuzan Mihaela *Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Andreea Cercel *Department of Neurology, University of Giessen Medical School, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Thorsten R DoeppnerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Dirk M HermannChair of Vascular Neurology and Dementia, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Roxana SurugiuChair of Vascular Neurology and Dementia, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Denisa F V PirscoveanuDepartment of Neurology, University of Giessen Medical School, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Aurel Popa-WagnerChair of Vascular Neurology and Dementia, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, 45147, Essen, Germany. aurel.popa-wagner@geriatrics-healthyageing.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4574-8605

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 760058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic inflammation following ischemic stroke is driven by a complex interplay among pro-inflammatory cytokines, immune cell activation, and neurovascular dysfunction. Both aging and obesity significantly amplify this inflammatory response, exacerbating stroke severity and impeding recovery. Aging induces a chronic low-grade inflammatory state-referred to as inflammaging-that heightens vulnerability to stroke-induced brain injury. Similarly, obesity promotes a persistent pro-inflammatory milieu that disrupts metabolic and immune homeostasis, further worsening neurological outcomes. The combined effects of aging and obesity pose a substantial barrier to effective stroke rehabilitation and long-term recovery. To improve post-stroke care, future research should focus on three key areas. First, there is a pressing need for targeted therapies that modulate systemic inflammation with minimal side effects. Anti-inflammatory agents such as minocycline have shown promise in preclinical models, but clinical validation is needed. Second, elucidating the molecular mechanisms linking aging, obesity, and systemic inflammation-such as the roles of adipokines and immune cell phenotypes-may reveal novel therapeutic targets. Finally, personalized treatment strategies that consider individual risk factors like age and obesity are essential to optimize stroke management and rehabilitation. Given the limited efficacy of current stroke treatments, prioritizing prevention by identifying high-risk individuals is critical. Recognizing non-modifiable risk factors can support more intensive intervention on modifiable ones and guide vigilance toward vulnerable populations. Overall, advancing our understanding of systemic inflammation and its modifiers will be key to developing innovative, patient-specific therapies aimed at improving outcomes and quality of life for stroke survivors.

Indexed as

InflammationStrokeAgingAnti-Inflammatory AgentsHumansObesityRisk FactorsStroke RehabilitationAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAgingAnti-inflammatory therapyIschemic strokeObesityRehabilitationSystemic inflammation

Identifiers

PMID41501546
PMCPMC12972390

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.