SynthesisBMC public health2026
Association of cooking fuel type with hypertension risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertension is a major global health concern and a leading cause of mortality, contributing to functional and structural damage in vital organs. Emerging evidence suggests that household air pollution (HAP) from the combustion of cooking fuels, plays a critical role in influencing the prevalence and mortality rates of hypertension. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the association between different cooking fuel types and hypertension risk.
methodsThe study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024589847). A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, WOS, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, and SinoMed up to September 3, 2024. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata 15.1 software. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and I² statistic, and an appropriate random-effects model (REM) or fixed-effects model (FEM) was applied based on the degree of heterogeneity observed.
resultsThe analysis revealed that the use of solid cooking fuels was significantly associated with increased odds of hypertension compared to clean cooking fuels (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03–1.25). Solid cooking fuel use was associated with higher systolic blood pressure (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01–0.24), although the difference may be close to the critical level. However, the association with diastolic blood pressure was not significant (SMD = 0.05, 95% CI: -0.06–0.16). Neither subgroup analysis nor meta-regression identified sources of heterogeneity, while sensitivity analyses and subgroup analysis confirmed robust results.Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of the results, with no evidence of significant publication bias.
conclusionsThis study provides evidence that solid cooking fuel use is associated with an elevated risk of hypertension. Despite limitations such as heterogeneity across study designs, the findings provide a strong scientific basis for policy interventions promoting a transition to cleaner cooking fuels. Future research should prioritize longitudinal or prospective study designs to enhance the quality of evidence and further elucidate this relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.