ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2026
Alpha-synuclein seeding activity in postmortem tissues from patients with diffuse and isolated Lewy bodies.
Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have evaluated the diagnostic potential of the seeding amplification assay (SAA) in detecting α-synuclein seeding activity in postmortem brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from patients with primary and co-pathology α-synucleinopathies. Moreover, we investigated potential SAA positivity in control samples which may suggest unrecognized co-pathology. A total of 15 brain and 14 CSF samples with definite dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB, n = 6), Alzheimer´s disease with amygdala Lewy body (AD/ALB, n = 3), and patients with concomitant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and Lewy body pathology (CJD/LBP, n = 6) comorbidity were tested for α-synuclein seeding activity using SAA assay utilizing recombinant α-synuclein (WT) with N-terminal His-tag. Control samples consisted of other neurodegenerative diseases (n = 17 for brain and n = 18 for CSF samples) and healthy corneal donors (n = 17). The analysis of seeding activity in brain samples suggested 100% sensitivity and 91.2% specificity. Five out of 34 brain control samples gave a positive SAA outcome. However, upon reevaluation, two of these samples were reclassified as Alzheimer´s disease (AD) with synucleinopathy co-pathology. The analysis of CSF also suggested 100% sensitivity and 94.4% specificity, although dilution of some samples was necessary to decrease the effect of inhibitors. We report a good performance of the SAA not only in postmortem samples from primary synucleinopathies with advanced pathology, but also in co-pathology synucleinopathies with isolated Lewy bodies in the amygdala in AD cases. Our findings highlight the importance of careful diagnostic evaluation in AD patients, where co-existing synucleinopathy may otherwise go unrecognized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.