Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502080›Full record

ReviewCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2026

Coronary Slow Flow and No-Reflow During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Contemporary Insights Into Imaging-Guided Prediction, Prevention, and Management.

Bharat Khialani, Eran Sim, George Touma, Sarah Fairley, Cuneyt Ada, Bernard Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bharat KhialaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Jln Tan Tock Seng, Singapore.
Eran SimDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Jln Tan Tock Seng, Singapore.
George ToumaHurstville Private Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah FairleyWellington Cardiology Department, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0711-9499
Cuneyt AdaDepartment of Cardiology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Bernard WongFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9346-8221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary slow flow (SF) and no-reflow (NR) are clinically significant complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), particularly in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and saphenous vein graft (SVG) interventions. Angiographically defined as impaired myocardial perfusion despite restored epicardial patency, SF/NR results from microvascular dysfunction driven by distal embolization, ischemia-reperfusion injury, microvascular spasm, capillary plugging and emerging molecular mechanisms such as endothelial glycocalyx degradation and microRNA-mediated inflammatory pathways. These processes contribute to larger infarct size, maladaptive remodeling, and increased mortality. Advanced intracoronary imaging enables lesion-level risk stratification by identifying features such as lipid-rich cores, thin-cap fibroatheromas, positive remodeling, and thrombus. Image-guided strategies, incorporating deferred stenting, selective aspiration, and tailored lesion preparation, can mitigate distal embolization. Risk stratification models (e.g., PAMI score) and recognition of sex- and race-based disparities further refine procedural planning. Cost, accessibility, and emerging AI-driven automated plaque characterization tools are important considerations for wider implementation. Preventive measures emphasize systemic optimization, adequate anticoagulation, high-intensity statin pretreatment informed by precision dosing, dual antiplatelet therapy, and refined device techniques in thrombus-rich or calcified lesions. Management requires early recognition, systematic exclusion of mimics such as dissection or epicardial spasm, maintenance of anticoagulation, and rapid stepwise administration of intracoronary microvasculature dilators. Device-based delivery methods offer practical advantages but carry specific risks, including device entrapment or vessel trauma. Adjunctive therapies such as supersaturated oxygen may be considered in refractory cases. A structured, imaging-informed algorithm integrating preventive strategies, pharmacologic escalation, and device-assisted therapy may reduce SF/NR incidence and improve procedural and long-term outcomes. Future research should validate imaging-guided preventive strategies, standardized rescue protocols, and the role of AI-driven risk assessment in diverse patient populations.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationNo-Reflow PhenomenonPercutaneous Coronary InterventionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionBlood Flow VelocityHumansPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41502080
PMCPMC12953209

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.