ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2026
Characterizing the Impact of the Cell Cycle on mRNA Lipid Nanoparticles.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CA9-Targeted Liposomal Delivery of siETS1 Inhibits Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Progression by Disrupting the ETS1/MYC Regulatory Axis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To grow and divide, cells must pass through the cell cycle, a series of phases (G0/G1, S, and G2/M) where they ultimately split from one cell into two. Notably, each of these phases is characterized by dynamic changes in properties central to the mechanism and efficacy of leading nanomedicines such as mRNA lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-based genetic medicines. Despite this, the relationship between cell cycle phases and mRNA LNP mechanism and efficacy remains relatively understudied, potentially hindering the development of next-generation therapies. Here, we characterize how key steps of the mechanism and efficacy of mRNA LNPs (including endocytosis pathway, endosomal escape, and protein expression) are impacted across the G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. Specifically, we analyze each of these mechanistic properties across multiple cell types, multiple LNP chemistries, and multiple mRNA payloads to further generalize our findings. Notably, our results collectively highlight that while uptake mechanism remains similar across each phase of the cell cycle, LNP uptake and protein translation are different between G0/G1, S, and G2/M, following the pattern G0/G1 < S < G2/M for these LNP chemistries, mRNA payloads, and cell types. Taken collectively, we hope that this study not only provides fundamental insights into the relationship between the cell cycle and mRNA LNPs but more broadly lays the foundations for the creation of next-generation genetic medicines that could transfect specific phases of the cell cycle for maximal efficacy in applications such as cancer with dysregulated cell cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.