ArticleKidney international reports2026
Delphi Consensus on Surrogate End Points in C3 Glomerulopathy and Primary Immune Complex-Mediated Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pegcetacoplan Versus Iptacopan for the Treatment of Patients with C3 Glomerulopathy: Indirect Treatment Comparisons.Advances in therapy · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) and primary immune complex-mediated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) are rare kidney diseases driven by complement dysregulation. Proteinuria is a commonly used clinical end point in trials involving these conditions. However, its recognition as a validated end point by regulatory bodies remains limited, despite growing evidence supporting its prognostic value as a surrogate biomarker for the development of kidney failure. The aim of this study was to establish consensus on the clinical relevance of proteinuria as a prognostic and treatment end point in C3G and primary IC-MPGN. Methods: A 2-round modified Delphi process was conducted, informed by literature review and expert input. A steering committee composed of 4 European nephrologists, 1 Canadian nephrologist, and 1 European rheumatologist developed 31 statements covering the following 3 domains: (i) treatment efficacy end points, (ii) current assessment end points, and (iii) the role of proteinuria. Statements formed part of an online survey using a 4-point Likert scale, distributed to a broader panel of nephrologists and kidney pathologists across Europe. Results: Fifty-one and 50 responses were received in rounds 1 and 2. Of the 31 statements, 29 reached consensus (≥ 75% agreement). Key consensus points included the following: (i) reduction in proteinuria preserves long-term kidney function and is a treatment goal; (ii) longitudinal monitoring of proteinuria, alongside other markers is valuable for guiding treatment; (iii) a ≥ 50% proteinuria reduction over 6 months indicates meaningful therapeutic benefit; and (iv) proteinuria < 1 g/d is associated with improved outcomes. Conclusion: This study demonstrates consensus supporting proteinuria as a meaningful treatment end point for C3G and primary IC-MPGN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.