ReviewUpsala journal of medical sciences2025
Systemic lupus erythematosus: from an adverse event of interferon administration to a disease with new treatment options.
Review in Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting type I interferon in lupus autoimmune haemolytic anaemia: first report with anifrolumab.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Immunometabolic remodeling of perivascular adipose tissue in murine lupus: implications for lupus vasculopathy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles as immunomodulatory agents: targeting pathological crosstalk in systemic lupus erythematosus and multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) display an increased expression of type I interferon (IFN)-regulated genes, a so-called IFN signature. This discovery was preceded by the observation in Uppsala that patients with malignant diseases treated with type I IFN occasionally developed autoimmune diseases, including SLE. The adverse event of IFN treatment was the start of an intensive search for the role of the type I IFN system in patients with spontaneously occurring SLE. A key finding by our group was the detection in patients with SLE of endogenous IFN-inducers that could activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) to IFN production. Further studies revealed the mechanisms by which these cells are triggered to a continuous IFN synthesis. We could also identify a large number of risk genes for SLE and several molecules connected to type I IFN production and response. My group early on suggested the possibility that some of these molecules are suitable therapeutic targets in SLE, but also other IFN-driven diseases. Antibodies against the type I IFN receptor (anifrolumab) have recently shown efficacy in clinical trials for SLE, and anifrolumab is now approved as a treatment for this disease. Several other drugs targeting critical molecules in the IFN signaling pathways - including BCDA-2 (Blood Dendritic Cell Antigen 2), TLR7/8 (Toll-like receptor 7/8), and TYK2 (Tyrosine Kinase 2) - are currently in early clinical phases, potentially expanding therapeutic options for SLE. In this review, several important observations regarding the role of the type I IFN system in SLE and therapeutic implications are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.