Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41503159›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2026

Evaluating imputation methods for accurate estimation of cell population fractions in single-cell RNA sequencing.

Anna A Valyaeva, Maria S Tochilkina, Eugene V Sheval

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna A ValyaevaBelozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-1206
Maria S TochilkinaSchool of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8744-3924
Eugene V ShevalBelozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1687-1321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revolutionized transcriptomic analysis, enabling high-resolution profiling of gene expression across individual cells. However, technical limitations, particularly dropout events, still hinder the accurate quantification of gene expression heterogeneity, resulting in an underestimation of gene-expressing cell proportions. Numerous computational methods have been developed to impute missing expression signals. In this study, we systematically evaluated eight prominent imputation algorithms-MAGIC, SAVER, scVI, DCA, scBiG, kNN-smoothing, scImpute, and ALRA-using two simulated datasets and a deeply sequenced reference dataset. We defined conditions that make it possible to improve estimates of cell population sizes and demonstrate the utility of imputation in biologically relevant contexts, including identifying cell populations susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and detecting CFTR-expressing cells. Our findings highlight the potential and limitations of current imputation strategies and offer practical recommendations for improving the interpretability and accuracy of scRNA-seq data.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsCOVID-19Gene Expression ProfilingHumansSARS-CoV-2Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41503159
PMCPMC12770975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.