ArticleHealth science reports2026
Introducing and Validating a Minimum Data Set and Core Functionalities for Remote Poststroke Home Monitoring: "A Cross-Sectional Study".
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Stroke is recognized as a significant global health concern. The design and implementation of remote patient monitoring systems necessitate the identification of relevant data elements to effectively address the needs of individuals following a stroke. Identification and validation of these data elements can contribute to the successful design and implementation of remote patient monitoring systems. This study aimed to identify the requirements for a remote monitoring system designed for poststroke patients. Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in three steps, including a literature review, expert panel discussions, and the Delphi technique. The literature was reviewed on electronic databases including the Cochrane Library, Wiley, Scopus, ProQuest, IEEE, PubMed, and Web of Science, using the keywords "stroke," "secondary stroke," "remote care," "telehealth," "remote patient monitoring," and "remote monitoring" from 2000 to 2023. Three expert panel sessions were conducted to review and categorize the extracted data elements, with content validity confirmed (CVR 0.89, CVI 0.97). Finally, the Delphi technique involving 20 neurologists was used to validate the finalized data elements and system functionalities. Results: Thirty-six studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria. A total of 75 data elements were extracted from the literature review. Finally, 61 data elements in three main categories (demographic information, clinical information, and system functionality) were classified and validated by experts as essential data elements for the design of a remote patient monitoring system for poststroke patients. Conclusion: The findings of this study encompass a range of fundamental capabilities of remote monitoring systems for poststroke patients. Consequently, this study can guide researchers interested in this field in identifying and selecting the appropriate path for developing a remote patient monitoring application for this group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.