Comparative Evaluation of Cameroonian Honey and Normal Saline in the Management of Chronic Wounds: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background and Aim: In Cameroon, honey shows potential as a low-cost, effective wound treatment due to its antimicrobial and wound-healing properties. This study seeks to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Cameroon honey compared to normal saline in the management of chronic wounds at the Buea Regional Hospital, Cameroon. Methods: This hospital-based randomized controlled trial was conducted at Buea Regional Hospital, Cameroon, over 6 months. Eighteen patients with chronic wounds were randomly assigned to receive either honey ( Results: Honey-treated wounds achieved a significantly higher wound closure rate (97%) and granulation tissue formation (90%) compared to saline-treated wounds (63% and 70%, respectively; Conclusion: Honey is a superior alternative to normal saline for managing chronic wounds, offering improved healing outcomes, effective infection control, and enhanced patient satisfaction. Its integration into routine wound care in resource-limited settings like Cameroon is highly recommended. Relevance to Clinical Practice: This study explores the potential of Cameroonian honey to promote quicker wound healing and improve the quality of life for patients with chronic wounds. By offering a low-cost, accessible alternative to normal saline, it supports better outcomes in resource-limited settings. Patient Contribution: Patients participated as the primary subjects in the study, consenting to receive either Cameroonian honey or normal saline for the dressing of their chronic wounds. Through their involvement, they provided firsthand data on wound healing progress and any side effects or improvements experienced.