ArticleRevista de neurologia2025
Life's Essential 8 and Parkinson's Disease Risk: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on NHANES Data (2005-2018).
Article in Revista de neurologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveExisting research on the link between Life's Essential 8 (LE8) and the risk of Parkinson's disease (PD) remains limited. This study aimed to elucidate how LE8 relates to PD risk among USA adults aged 40 and above.
methodsData were derived from the 2005-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to control for selection bias. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to assess the association between LE8 and PD prevalence, while restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling was adopted to explore potential relationships. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted to further examine the connection between LE8 and PD.
resultsA total of 18,270 participants were included, among whom 259 reported having PD. An inverse association was observed between LE8 and PD. Prior to matching, the odds ratio (OR) for per 1 point increase in LE8 was 0.98, and 0.97 after matching. Compared with individuals with low LE8 scores (<50), those with moderate scores (50-79) had a PD OR of 0.62 before matching and 0.52 after matching. Participants with high LE8 scores (≥80) observed a PD OR of 0.43 prior to matching and 0.32 post-matching. RCS curves suggested a non-linear inverse trend. Subgroup analyses revealed a consistent inverse association between LE8 scores and PD risk across the majority of strata.
conclusionAmong adults aged 40 and older, LE8 was inversely correlated with PD prevalence. Given the cross-sectional design, causal relationships cannot be inferred; however, the findings suggest that lifestyle modifications may aid in PD prevention and warrant further investigation in prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.