Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41504200›Full record

ReviewRevista de neurologia2025

Potential Therapeutic Targets and Emerging Strategies to Promote Hematoma Resolution in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Shuling Wan, Xunming Ji, Ran Meng, Min Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista de neurologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuling WanDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, 100053 Beijing, China.
Xunming JiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, 100053 Beijing, China.
Ran MengDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, 100053 Beijing, China.
Min LiDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, 100053 Beijing, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82401527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating stroke subtype with high morbidity and mortality. Beyond primary injury from blood extravasation, secondary injury driven by erythrocyte lysis and its toxic degradation products exacerbates inflammation, oxidative stress, and neuronal damage. Accelerating endogenous hematoma resolution, including the removal of erythrocytes and their byproducts, represents a promising therapeutic strategy. This review systematically delineates three key mechanisms of hematoma resolution post-ICH: (1) erythrophagocytosis by microglia/macrophages through Tyro3, Axl, and Mertk (TAM) receptors, the cluster of differentiation (CD) 36 receptor, the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2, and the signal regulatory protein α receptor; (2) clearance of hemolytic products through the hemoglobin-haptoglobin-CD163 and hemin-hemopexin-CD91 axes; and (3) glymphatic and meningeal lymphatic drainage. Pharmacological, genetic, and physical interventions targeting these pathways have demonstrated potential to enhance phagocytosis, promote glymphatic and meningeal lymphatic function, accelerate hematoma resolution, and improve neurological outcomes in ICH models. By leveraging the intrinsic clearance mechanisms of the intracerebral hematoma, this review highlights promising therapeutic targets and strategies to overcome current clinical limitations and demonstrates significant translational potential.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageHematomaAnimalsErythrocytesGlymphatic SystemHumansMacrophagesMicrogliaPhagocytosisglymphatic systemhematoma absorptionintracerebral hemorrhagemeningeal lymphatic vesselsnovel therapyphagocytosis

Identifiers

PMID41504200
PMCPMC12781221

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.