Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41504371›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026

Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of Behavioral Support and Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Smokeless Tobacco Cessation in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan.

Faraz Siddiqui, Fayaz Ahmad, Fariza Fieroze, Silwa Lina, Laraib Mazhar, Anila Mahmood Nawaz, Varsha Pandey, Prashant Kumar Singh, Narjis Rizvi, Shikha Saxena and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Faraz SiddiquiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2253-3911
Fayaz AhmadInstitute of Public Health and Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-8597-663X
Fariza FierozeARK Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Silwa LinaARK Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Laraib MazharDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-7335-2336
Anila Mahmood NawazDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Varsha PandeyDivision of Preventive Oncology & Population Health, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research (ICMR-NICPR), Noida, India.
Prashant Kumar SinghDivision of Preventive Oncology & Population Health, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research (ICMR-NICPR), Noida, India.
Narjis RizviDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-7074-162X
Shikha SaxenaDivision of Preventive Oncology & Population Health, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research (ICMR-NICPR), Noida, India.
Ray CroucherDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Ian KellarSchool of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Centre of the Social Sciences, Sheffield, UK.
Heather ThomsonLeeds City Council, Leeds, UK.
Javaid Ahmed KhanSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Rumana HuqueARK Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-7616-9596
Romaina IqbalDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Kamran SiddiqiHull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1529-7778
Mona KanaanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7956-7576
Linda BauldUsher Institute and Behavioural Research UK, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7411-4260
Cath JacksonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3181-7091

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInterventions for quitting smokeless tobacco are lacking in South Asia. In a pilot trial, we explored the feasibility of delivering and evaluating a culturally adapted behavioral intervention and/or nicotine replacement therapy in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. This article presents the process evaluation.

methodsMixed methods consisted of interviews with 46 participants and five cessation advisors, a questionnaire completed by 236 trial participants, fidelity assessment of intervention delivery for 38 participants and intervention logs. Data were triangulated across three process evaluation functions (implementation, mechanisms of impact, context) and self-reported abstinence outcomes.

resultsAfter everyone attending the pre-quit behavioral session, attendance dropped to 86.3% (quit session) and 65.9% (>1 post-quit sessions). Abstainers attended more sessions. Advisors were confident in delivering the intervention, favoring face-to-face over remote, yet fidelity scores showed room for improvement. Attendance and fidelity scores were consistently best in Bangladesh. There was high acceptability and perceived usefulness of the behavioral intervention with an important role for the advisor especially among abstainers. Two-thirds perceived nicotine replacement therapy as useful, higher among abstainers. Taste and side effects were barriers; adherence was highest in India. Perceived drivers to cessation were new knowledge leading to positive attitudes, beliefs in capability to quit, and family support. Perceived barriers were nicotine addiction, social pressure, and easy access to smokeless tobacco.

conclusionsThis process evaluation affirms the feasibility and acceptability of implementing the Behavioral Intervention to support Smokeless Tobacco Cessation in Adults and nicotine replacement therapy interventions while identifying important areas for improvement prior to a full effectiveness trial. IMPLICATIONS: This study provides detailed insights on the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally adapted behavioral intervention and of nicotine replacement therapy for smokeless tobacco cessation in Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. They identify important implications for the design and delivery of future effectiveness trials of smokeless tobacco cessation interventions that are lacking in this region.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyNicotine Replacement TherapyTobacco, SmokelessTobacco Use CessationTobacco Use DisorderAdherence InterventionsAdultBangladeshFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPakistanPilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41504371
PMCPMC13196702

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.