ArticleMedical care2026
Preventable Differences in Recommended Outpatient COVID-19 Treatment Among Adults With COVID-19 in the United States.
Article in Medical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PCORnet®: Accelerating Patient-Centered Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Research.Medical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic exposed differences in health care outcomes, including the prescription of COVID-19 antiviral medications. This analysis aimed to describe prescribing patterns in outpatient COVID-19 treatment and assess factors that contributed to these differences.
methodsA cross-sectional analysis was conducted using electronic health record data from August 2022 through March 2024 from health care institutions participating in PCORnet,® the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize COVID-19 outpatients eligible for treatment, and regression models were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) of prescribed COVID-19 outpatient treatment. Interaction terms assessed the interactions between race and ethnicity and the combined comorbidity index (CCI), age and sex, and age and race and ethnicity.
resultsOf 1,247,420 patients eligible for COVID-19 treatment, 334,947 (26.9%) were prescribed outpatient treatment. In adjusted analyses, compared with White patients, all other racial and ethnic groups had lower aPR for treatment (aPRs:0.89-0.99), except patients who reported being multiracial (aPR:1.00; 95% CI: 0.93-1.08). Those aged 65-74 were prescribed treatment more often (aPR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.12-1.13) compared with patients aged 20-49. Patients with a CCI of 1-3 and ≥4 were prescribed treatment less often (aPR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-1.01 and aPR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94, respectively), compared with those with a CCI of ≤0. These differences were sustained when considering the interactions between race and age and race and CCI.
conclusionsWe found differences in recommended outpatient treatment by several sociodemographic variables. Addressing COVID-19 prescription barriers is essential to slow preventable differences from unmet COVID-19 outpatient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.