ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2026
Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: barriers to implementation in real-world practice.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impacts of neoadjuvant therapy on subsequent surgical difficulty, safety, and outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer: a narrative review.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTotal neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has demonstrated superior oncologic outcomes and improved organ preservation in randomized trials for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This study aimed to assess the real-world implementation of TNT in clinical routine and identify barriers to its application.
methodsThis retrospective, multicenter cohort study analyzed 111 patients with LARC treated between February 2021 and May 2024 across three certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany. Patients were stratified into TNT and non-TNT groups according to their neoadjuvant treatment modality. Primary endpoints included treatment adherence, disease-free survival (DFS), postoperative morbidity, and documented reasons for omitting TNT. Outcomes were compared with benchmark protocols from established TNT trials.
resultsDespite fulfilling guideline criteria, only 23 of 111 patients (20%) received TNT. Main barriers to TNT included advanced age, comorbidities, and patient refusal. The 1-year DFS rate was 96% in the TNT group and 94% in the non-TNT group. Severe low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) occurred in 9% of TNT patients compared to 22% in the non-TNT group. Postoperative complication rates were similar across both groups. While TNT was associated with favorable trends in disease control and functional outcomes, statistical significance was not reached.
conclusionThere is a notable discrepancy between clinical guideline recommendations and real-world TNT implementation in LARC. Addressing patient-specific barriers and adopting standardized, risk-adapted treatment decision frameworks may improve clinical integration of TNT, particularly in older and comorbid populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.