[Interdisciplinary collaboration between anesthesia and surgery : Which key issues need to be addressed?]

Grietje Beck, Christoph Reißfelder, Verena Ghezel-Ahmadi

Abstract readEnglish Abstract

In one paragraph

Article in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grietje BeckKlinik für Anästhesie, operative Intensiv- und Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland. Grietje.beck@umm.de.

Christoph ReißfelderChirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.

Verena Ghezel-AhmadiKlinik für Anästhesie, operative Intensiv- und Schmerzmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A close interdisciplinary collaboration between anesthesia and surgery is essential to ensure that our mutual patients receive the best possible care throughout the entire surgical process. Both specialties have different tasks and perspectives and only when these are balanced with rather than against each other can the operating room, along with all related preoperative and postoperative measures, become a place where excellent medicine, patient safety and efficient management go hand in hand. Despite potential areas of conflict interdisciplinary cooperation between surgeons and anesthesiologists can be highly effective when mutual respect, structured communication and shared decision-making are upheld and cultivated. This article aims to provide an overview of some key prerequisites for successful collaboration in this context.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaInterdisciplinary CommunicationPatient Care TeamCommunicationCooperative BehaviorHumansPatient SafetyCommunicationOperation managementPatient safetyShared decision makingTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID41504813

DOI10.1093/intqhc/mzq079

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.