Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41505337›Full record

ReviewScience progress

Research progress in the application of stent in TIPS procedures.

Lei Qi, Yihao Wang, Wen Li, Shuangshuang Li, Jian Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lei QiOriental Pan-Vascular Devices Innovation College, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0006-1401-4659
Yihao WangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wen LiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Shuangshuang LiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) stands as a pivotal interventional therapy for managing portal hypertension (PH) and its associated complications. Distinguished from pharmacological treatments, endoscopic interventions, or surgical portocaval shunts, TIPS has achieved extensive clinical application attributed to its minimally invasive nature and efficacy. Notwithstanding, complications ensuing from TIPS, such as hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and shunt dysfunction, etc, significantly impact patient prognosis. Over the course of several decades, a diverse array of stent types and diameters have become available for TIPS procedures. Moreover, the stent puncture position and the initial stent position also exhibit variability. Our review aims to address this gap in knowledge by reviewing the research progress on stent types, diameters, puncture positions, and initial stent positions in the context of TIPS. It presents a comprehensive overview of the various stent options available for TIPS procedures and highlights the importance of individualized treatment approaches in reducing surgical complications and improving patient prognosis. The findings outlined in our review provide valuable insights for clinicians and researchers in the field.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PortalPortasystemic Shunt, Transjugular IntrahepaticStentsHepatic EncephalopathyHumansHEPHstent diametersstent positonsstent typesTIPS

Identifiers

PMID41505337
PMCPMC12783551

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.