ReviewScience progress
Research progress in the application of stent in TIPS procedures.
Review in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hepatic Encephalopathy after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Using Dedicated versus Generic Stent-Grafts in Cirrhotic Patients.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) stands as a pivotal interventional therapy for managing portal hypertension (PH) and its associated complications. Distinguished from pharmacological treatments, endoscopic interventions, or surgical portocaval shunts, TIPS has achieved extensive clinical application attributed to its minimally invasive nature and efficacy. Notwithstanding, complications ensuing from TIPS, such as hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and shunt dysfunction, etc, significantly impact patient prognosis. Over the course of several decades, a diverse array of stent types and diameters have become available for TIPS procedures. Moreover, the stent puncture position and the initial stent position also exhibit variability. Our review aims to address this gap in knowledge by reviewing the research progress on stent types, diameters, puncture positions, and initial stent positions in the context of TIPS. It presents a comprehensive overview of the various stent options available for TIPS procedures and highlights the importance of individualized treatment approaches in reducing surgical complications and improving patient prognosis. The findings outlined in our review provide valuable insights for clinicians and researchers in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.