ArticleSurgical innovation2026
Preclinical Safety Evaluation of the LapBox Power Tissue Containment System Under Simulated Worst-Case Conditions in a Porcine Model.
Article in Surgical innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/NeedUncontained power morcellation during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery risks intra-abdominal dissemination of benign or malignant tissue, a significant safety concern highlighted by FDA warnings. This has created a critical need for robust and reliable tissue containment systems that can be easily integrated into surgical workflows to mitigate this risk.Methodology and device descriptionThe LapBox Power Tissue Containment System is a single-use device featuring a dual-walled inflatable chamber designed to create a secure environment for morcellation. We conducted a Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)-compliant toxicology study in three female domestic pigs to assess its safety under simulated worst-case conditions. The device was inserted laparoscopically, and the internal dual-walled chamber of the device was inflated to a high pressure (∼160 mmHg) to simulate a localized worst-case compressive scenario, while the overall intra-abdominal insufflation was maintained at a standard 15 mmHg. Postoperative monitoring included clinical observation, bloodwork, and, at day 13, necropsy and histopathology.Preliminary ResultsAll procedures were completed without mortality, morbidity, or device-related complications. The LapBox maintained full structural integrity. Postoperative clinical, hematological, and biochemical parameters showed no adverse effects. Gross necropsy and detailed histopathology confirmed the absence of device-related ischemia, necrosis, thrombosis, or foreign-body reaction.Current statusThis preclinical study demonstrates that the LapBox Power system has an excellent safety profile and biocompatibility, even under extreme conditions. The device is ready for the next stage of evaluation. These findings support its translational potential and warrant further investigation in human clinical studies to confirm its safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.