ArticleBMJ open2026
Sex-specific machine learning models for carotid plaque prediction in individuals with fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEarly detection of carotid plaque prevents stroke and myocardial infarction. Individuals with fatty liver might be at an increased risk of developing carotid plaque, yet limited access to carotid artery ultrasound underscores the need for predictive models.
aimsWe aimed to construct six predictive models for males and females separately to predict carotid plaque among individuals with fatty liver disease.
designA cross-sectional study. DATA SOURCES: We included 8361 participants aged ≥40 years (4871 males; 3490 females) with fatty liver who underwent at least one health check-up between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2023.
methodsThe sex-stratified dataset was randomly divided into 70% training and 30% internal testing datasets. With 24 potential predictors, we applied four machine learning (ML) algorithms and two conventional logistic regression (LR) models: stepwise LR and LR based on ML-selected features (LR-ML) to develop sex-specific carotid plaque prediction models. The performances were evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, accuracy, calibration curve and decision curve analysis.
main outcome measuresCarotid plaque was determined when the local carotid intima-media thickness was ≥1.5 mm in any of the arterial segments.
resultsFour predictors (age, hypertension, total bilirubin, total cholesterol and white blood cell count) in males and three (age, systolic blood pressure and fasting blood glucose) in females were identified by consensus across the four ML algorithms and subsequently used to construct LR models. Among all 4 ML and two LR models, the gradient boosting machine model demonstrated the best overall performance in males (AUC=0.773, 95% CI 0.749 to 0.797), while the LR-ML model was optimal in females (AUC=0.817, 95% CI 0.791 to 0.843). Calibration and decision curve analyses further demonstrated satisfactory agreement and higher net benefit across sexes. Risk stratification identified distinct low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups with progressively higher observed prevalence of carotid plaque (20.25%, 48.58% and 69.41% in males; 15.28%, 50.89% and 66.56% in females).
conclusionOur findings highlight significant sex differences in practical carotid plaque prediction, providing crucial insights for public health implications in the early identification and risk assessment of carotid plaque among individuals with fatty liver.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.