ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid stacked autoencoder and support vector machines-based expert system for heart failure detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting delirium risk in postoperative brain tumor patients in the Intensive Care Unit.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) detection is a critical task in medical diagnostics, often requiring accurate and efficient methods. This paper introduces a novel hybrid three stage expert system designed to improve HF detection. The proposed system integrates stacked autoencoder (AE) for feature extraction, an [Formula: see text]-penalized support vector machine (SVM) to select high quality subset of features from the autoencoded features, and a non-linear SVM for classification. The stacked AE extracts meaningful features from a set of HF risk factors, while the [Formula: see text]-SVM refines the feature set by selecting the most relevant features. In the final stage, a non-linear SVM with RBF kernel is used to classify the refined feature subset. The system is validated using a benchmark HF dataset, and its performance is evaluated using various metrics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), and area under the curve (AUC). Experimental results show that the proposed system achieves an accuracy of 97.78%, sensitivity of 97.56%, specificity of 97.96%, and an MCC value of 0.955, outperforming current state-of-the-art methods. The system's ability to achieve high performance with a reduced feature set highlights its efficiency. The proposed approach provides a robust solution for HF detection, offering valuable decision support for healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.