ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Proteomic signatures and machine learning based-prediction models for cardiovascular risk in survivors of myocardial infarction.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circulating excitation-contraction coupling proteins and incident cardiovascular outcomes: associations and incremental predictive performance in the UK Biobank.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurvivors of myocardial infarction (MI) are still at risk for adverse long-term outcomes such as all-cause mortality, heart failure (HF), and ischemic stroke (IS) after acute phase treatment.
aimsThis study aimed to identify specific protein markers and construct risk prediction models for the main cardiovascular events in survivors of MI.
methodsA total of 30,135 survivors of MI were included in this study, all of whom had available follow-up data from the UK Biobank (UKB). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the clinical associations between plasma proteins and MI-related outcomes, including all-cause mortality, HF and IS. Subsequently, prediction models with machine learning were constructed based on the plasma protein levels to further evaluate these associations.
resultsWe identified 570 proteins significantly associated with all-cause mortality, 172 with HF, and 13 with IS in survivors of MI. Among these proteins, 12 proteins were associated with three outcomes (P < 1.71×10− 5). Pathway enrichment analysis showed that these proteins were mainly involved in pathophysiological processes such as inflammatory response, fibrosis and myocardial remodeling. Machine learning models based on 117, 73 and 82 plasma protein showed good predictive performance for all-cause mortality (XGBoost: AUC = 0.79), HF (LightGBM: AUC = 0.81) and IS (Random Forest: AUC = 0.76) in survivors of MI, respectively. Finally, we systematically identified 52 plasma proteins associated with all-cause mortality, 14 with HF, and 4 with IS in survivors of MI through integrated Cox regression and machine learning modeling.
conclusionOur integrated study with predictive modeling have identified the plasma protein biomarkers associated with adverse outcomes in survivors of MI, and subsequently developed predictive models to facilitate early risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.