ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2026
Hydrogels strategies for organ adhesions: from mechanism to application.
Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anti-Adhesion Effects and Potential Mechanisms of Polyglutamic Acid-Polylysine Crosslinked Hydrogels in a Rat Peritoneal Adhesion Model.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Engineering Hydrogels for Intrauterine Adhesion Therapy and Endometrial Regeneration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Organ adhesions pose a significant clinical challenge, arising from factors such as congenital adhesions caused by embryonic developmental abnormalities, as well as acquired adhesions resulting from inflammation or surgery. This phenomenon commonly occurs in conditions such as peritonitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and malignant tumor infiltration. Postoperative adhesions might cause serious complications such as chronic pain, infertility and intestinal obstruction. Traditional treatment methods (anti-adhesion membranes and drug therapy), have some limitations, including insufficient mechanical properties, poor biocompatibility or difficulty in achieving full intervention. As a novel generation of biomaterials, hydrogels demonstrate significant advantages in preventing and treating organ adhesions: physical barriers, biocompatibility, multidimensional functional integration, controlled drug release, dynamic adaptation to complex environments, and intelligent responsiveness. This review aims to systematically summarize research progress on hydrogels in organ adhesion prevention and treatment, integrating their mechanisms of action across different pathological stages, material innovations, and organ application cases. This study provides strategies to overcome clinical translation bottlenecks and outlines future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.