Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41507942›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2026

Hydrogels strategies for organ adhesions: from mechanism to application.

Pan Liang, Chenyan Zhao, Xin Peng, Tao Ye, Li Deng, Lei Wang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Hongyan Lei, Yongzhou Wang, Mijia Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pan Liang *Drug Research Center of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.
Chenyan Zhao *Drug Research Center of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.
Xin PengDrug Research Center of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.
Tao YeDrug Research Center of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.
Li DengDrug Research Center of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.
Lei WangDrug Research Center of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.
Xiaoyu ZhouDrug Research Center of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.
Hongyan LeiDrug Research Center of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.
Yongzhou WangDrug Research Center of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China. fkwyz@swmu.edu.cn.
Mijia ZhangDrug Research Center of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China. migacheung@swmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Luzhou Science and Technology Program 2022-JYJ-119National Natural Science Foundation of China 8240519Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2024NSFSC1819Southwest Medical University 2023ZYYQ05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ adhesions pose a significant clinical challenge, arising from factors such as congenital adhesions caused by embryonic developmental abnormalities, as well as acquired adhesions resulting from inflammation or surgery. This phenomenon commonly occurs in conditions such as peritonitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, and malignant tumor infiltration. Postoperative adhesions might cause serious complications such as chronic pain, infertility and intestinal obstruction. Traditional treatment methods (anti-adhesion membranes and drug therapy), have some limitations, including insufficient mechanical properties, poor biocompatibility or difficulty in achieving full intervention. As a novel generation of biomaterials, hydrogels demonstrate significant advantages in preventing and treating organ adhesions: physical barriers, biocompatibility, multidimensional functional integration, controlled drug release, dynamic adaptation to complex environments, and intelligent responsiveness. This review aims to systematically summarize research progress on hydrogels in organ adhesion prevention and treatment, integrating their mechanisms of action across different pathological stages, material innovations, and organ application cases. This study provides strategies to overcome clinical translation bottlenecks and outlines future research directions.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsAnimalsHumansTissue AdhesionsBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsBioactive materialsHydrogelsMechanismOrgan adhesionsTissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID41507942
PMCPMC12874722

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.