ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025
Impact of Personalized Parenteral Nutrition on Inflammatory Markers and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Personalized Parenteral Nutrition-Comparing Apples and Oranges?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Personalized parenteral nutrition (PPN) is a customized strategy to address the individual metabolic and nutritional requirements of the critically ill patients, especially in cases where enteral nutrition (EN) is not possible. However, available evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety is still inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the impact of PPN on the clinical outcome of critically ill patients, including its effect on their length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), morbidity, and mortality. Methodology: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Information pertinent to the question was retrieved from the selected studies by using a structured data extraction form. Included studies were those that had assessed the impact on clinical outcomes of PPN in critically ill patients. Data were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis model. An odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used as the pooled effect size. Results: The meta-analysis included seven studies. The clinical risk was significantly higher in PPN with an OR of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.10-1.39; Conclusion: Personalized parenteral nutrition has demonstrated improved benefits in tailored nutritional support for critically ill patients. The evidence, however, has shown mixed clinical outcomes, and its effect on mortality and morbidity has been inconclusive. Future research is needed to optimize the composition of PPN formulations and evaluate the long-term effects of this intervention. How to cite this article: Gatar O, Arishi AA, Sultan MA, Gatar MM. Impact of Personalized Parenteral Nutrition on Inflammatory Markers and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(12):1040-1049.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.