ReviewTheranostics2026
Physical stimuli-responsive CRISPR-Cas9 systems for spatiotemporally precise control of genome engineering.
Review in Theranostics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Materialogenetics: an emerging and promising framework for cell-specific genetic manipulation.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Inducible CRISPR/Cas systems in precision oncology: Current applications and future perspectives.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) endonuclease system has revolutionized biology research by enabling precise, efficient, and versatile genome editing. However, achieving spatiotemporally controlled gene editing within specific organs, tissues, or cells remains a major challenge, as unregulated CRISPR-Cas9 activity can lead to severe off-target effects, hindering its clinical translation. To enhance the on-target precision and reduce the unwanted consequences of aberrant or premature CRISPR-Cas9 activation, various strategies have been developed to regulate its function at translational or post-translational stages using diverse external physicochemical stimuli. While chemical molecule-inducible CRISPR-Cas9 systems have demonstrated significant progress, most of them still suffer from inherent deficiencies, such as unsatisfactory spatiotemporal precision, irreversibility, pharmacokinetic dependence, internal disturbance, and safety concerns related to chemical inducers. By contrast, externally applied physical stimuli provide distinct advantages for triggering CRISPR-Cas9 activity, offering superior spatiotemporal precision, reversibility, and biocompatibility. These features significantly enhance the controllability, target specificity, and practical applicability of CRISPR-Cas9 systems across diverse biological settings. This review systematically explores recent advances in physical stimuli-responsive CRISPR-Cas9 platforms, detailing their design strategies, activation mechanisms, and proof-of-concept applications. Furthermore, we provide a comparative analysis of different stimulation strategies, highlighting their respective characteristics, current limitations, and future prospects. A discussion on the persistent bench-to-bedside gap is also included, aiming to guide future development toward clinically viable solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.