ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
Analysis of Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Evaluation Workflow in the Emergency Department.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: The decision to image children for cervical spine injuries (CSI), an uncommon injury with high associated morbidity and mortality, is complex. X-rays and computed tomography are often used to screen for CSI; however, radiation exposure increases lifetime cancer risk. We recently developed a CSI prediction rule to inform pediatric imaging decisions. To guide implementation, we conducted a workflow analysis of CSI screening in children after blunt trauma. Methods: We interviewed emergency departments (ED) and trauma clinicians at 21 hospitals following the applied cognitive task analysis task diagram, knowledge audit, and simulation interview approaches. Interviews were coded using a combined deductive-inductive approach to construct a workflow diagram and identify critical decisions with associated workflow junctures, decision makers, physical locations, and cognitive demands. We noted areas of high, medium, and low variability. Results: We interviewed 48 participants (emergency medicine physicians and advanced practice providers [n = 22], nurses [n = 14], and surgeons [n = 12]) across 21 hospitals located in the Western (n = 15), Northeastern (n = 5), and Midwestern (n = 1) USA. Critical decisions within the pediatric CSI imaging decision workflow included trauma triaging, spinal motion restriction application, clinical clearance, decision to image, and imaging type. There was moderate-to-high variability between hospitals for most workflow junctures and decision makers. However, more consistent patterns emerged, such as a high level of ED and trauma attending involvement throughout the process. The knowledge audit revealed a heavy cognitive load associated with decision making. "Big picture," "past and future," "noticing", "job smarts," and "equipment" were highly relevant cognitive demands. Conclusion: Moderate-to-high between-hospital variability in workflow for decision making around CSI evaluation for pediatric trauma patients could potentially complicate CSI prediction rule implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.