ArticleDepression and anxiety2026
A Longitudinal Network Analysis of Depressive Symptoms Among Older Adults: Findings From an 8-Year Prospective China National Survey.
Article in Depression and anxiety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Late-life depression (LLD) is a significant global public health challenge among older adults. Exploring central/influential symptoms with longitudinal study designs can enhance the efficacy of detection, early prevention, and interventions for LLD. This study aimed to identify key symptoms of LLD using a panel graphical vector autoregression (panel-GVAR) model based on longitudinal national survey data. Methods: Data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) between 2013 and 2020, encompassing four waves, were utilized to construct a longitudinal depressive symptom network. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10). In expected influence (in-EI) and out expected influence (out-EI) were identified to characterize the interaction of symptoms within the temporal network, while expected influence (EI) was used to examine the interaction of symptoms in both the contemporaneous network and the between-subjects network. Results: A total of 1393 older adults were assessed. A persistently significant increase in the prevalence of depression was observed over time. In the temporal network, "restless sleep" (CESD7) and "could not get going" (CESD10) were the most influential symptom and most influenced symptom, respectively. In both the contemporaneous network and the between-subjects network, "felt depressed" (CESD3) emerged as the most central symptom within the community of depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Given the challenges associated with treating LLD and its adverse effects on daily life for older adults, timely interventions targeting identified key symptoms may help prevent and mitigate depression in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.